My situation closely mirrors the case of attorney Ulrich Richter Morales, who sued Google for defamation after the company refused for six years to remove false information about him. In my case, the same principle applies — but in reverse. The evidence I am presenting is extensive, thorough, sufficient, and irrefutable. It is time for these platforms and institutions to become more accountable, to actually examine who is telling the truth and who is not, based on solid, verifiable evidence.
Google initially argued that it could not be sued in Mexico because it was based in the United States. However, Richter Morales and his legal partner, attorney Ramírez, successfully argued that Google's corporate offices in the Santa Fe area of Mexico City constituted a legal extension of its presence in the country. Even though Google's corporate headquarters are in the United States, the company maintains a physical presence in Mexico — and the internet, the digital world, is universal. That argument prevailed.
I intend to pursue legal action against Mayo Clinic for engaging in misleading advertising. Mayo Clinic promotes Medica Sur as "Mayo Clinic Care Network Mexico," and both institutions describe themselves on their respective websites as partners and members of the Mayo Clinic Care Network. Yet in their private contracts, Mayo Clinic explicitly states that it holds no responsibility for the surgical outcomes at Medica Sur — a disclaimer that should be prominently disclosed on their public-facing websites as well. This omission is, at its core, a matter of deceptive advertising.
Much like Google, Mayo Clinic maintains corporate offices physically located within Medica Sur's facilities. I underwent surgery at Medica Sur because I trusted Mayo Clinic's advertising, which implied that Medica Sur followed Mayo Clinic's surgical protocols. The reality proved to be far removed from what both institutions represent on their websites. For this reason, Mayo Clinic bears joint liability for Medica Sur's actions: it promoted Medica Sur as an expert partner while burying, in fine print, the clause disclaiming responsibility for Medica Sur's surgical errors and medical decisions.
My case parallels that of attorney Ulrich Richter Morales, but with the roles reversed. In my situation, Google is obstructing my right to defend myself, to seek treatment, to pursue justice, and to exercise my freedom of expression.
I intend to hold Mayo Clinic jointly liable for the harmful conduct at Medica Sur, and to pursue legal action against Cloudflare for surveillance, harassment, and the systematic suppression of my freedom of expression. I hope it will not become necessary to also take legal action against Google, as I am already in contact with attorney Richter Morales regarding this matter.
